Journal
ENERGIES
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en9080622
Keywords
photovoltaic (PV); crystalline Si (c-Si); cadmium telluride (CdTe); copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS); life cycle assessment (LCA); net energy analysis (NEA); energy return on investment (EROI); energy pay-back time (EPBT); environmental performance
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Given photovoltaics' (PVs) constant improvements in terms of material usage and energy efficiency, this paper provides a timely update on their life-cycle energy and environmental performance. Single-crystalline Si (sc-Si), multi-crystalline Si (mc-Si), cadmium telluride (CdTe) and copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS) systems are analysed, considering the actual country of production and adapting the input electricity mix accordingly. Energy pay-back time (EPBT) results for fixed-tilt ground mounted installations range from 0.5 years for CdTe PV at high-irradiation (2300 kWh/(m(2).yr)) to 2.8 years for sc-Si PV at low-irradiation (1000 kWh/(m(2).yr)), with corresponding quality-adjusted energy return on investment (EROIPE-eq) values ranging from over 60 to similar to 10. Global warming potential (GWP) per kWhel averages out at similar to 30 g (CO2-eq), with lower values (down to similar to 10 g) for CdTe PV at high irradiation, and up to similar to 80 g for Chinese sc-Si PV at low irradiation. In general, results point to CdTe PV as the best performing technology from an environmental life-cycle perspective, also showing a remarkable improvement for current production modules in comparison with previous generations. Finally, we determined that one-axis tracking installations can improve the environmental profile of PV systems by approximately 10% for most impact metrics.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available