4.3 Review

Current Concepts Review: Common Peroneal Nerve Palsy After Knee Dislocations

Journal

FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 658-668

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1071100721995421

Keywords

palsy; common peroneal nerve; Bridle procedure; dislocation; knee; foot drop

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Managing concurrent knee dislocation and common peroneal nerve injury requires multi-disciplinary coordination involving knee reconstruction, nerve decompression, and foot and ankle surgery. Surgical techniques like the Bridle Procedure can successfully restore function, with timing of interventions and maintenance of passive range of motion being crucial.
Dislocation of the native knee represents a challenging injury, further complicated by the high rate of concurrent injury to the common peroneal nerve (CPN). Initial management of this injury requires a thorough neurovascular examination, given the prevalence of popliteal artery injury and limb-threatening ischemia. Further management of a knee dislocation with associated CPN palsy requires coordinated care involving the sports surgeon for ligamentous knee reconstruction and the peripheral nerve surgeon for staged or concurrent peroneal nerve decompression and/or reconstruction. Finally, the foot and ankle surgeon is often required to manage a foot drop with a distal tendon transfer to restore foot dorsiflexion. For instance, the Bridle Procedure-a modification of the anterior transfer of the posterior tibialis muscle, under the extensor retinaculum, with tri-tendon anastomosis to the anterior tibial and peroneus longus tendons at the anterior ankle-can successfully return patients to brace-free ambulation and athletic function following CPN palsy. Cross-discipline coordination and collaboration is essential to ensure appropriate timing of operative interventions and ensure maintenance of passive dorsiflexion prior to tendon transfer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available