4.7 Article

Amylopectin crystal seeds: Characterization and their effect on amylopectin retrogradation

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106409

Keywords

Amylopectin crystal seeds; Retrograded amylopectin; Crystal structure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China - China [31901731, 31972027]
  2. Ten Thousand Talent Program Youth Top-notch Talent Project - China
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities - China [JUSRP22017]
  4. Taishan Industry Leader Talent Project - China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the study, it was found that crystal seeds with B-type structures could enhance the relative crystallinity and retrogradation rate of amylopectin, whereas crystal seeds with A-type structures had no significant effect on amylopectin retrogradation.
Amylopectin retrogradation greatly affects the overall characteristics of starch. It occurs gradually over a long period of time and the results of its measurement are often subtle. In this study, three types of amylopectin crystal seeds (ACS) were prepared and added to rice amylopectin to enhance the detectability of amylopectin retrogradation. Among the ACS, two crystal seeds with B-type structures increased the relative crystallinity of retrograded amylopectin by a maximum of 4.73% and the retrogradation rate constant from 0.035 up to the maximum 0.045 d(-1). These results indicated that these two types of ACS with similar crystal structures increased the nuclei formation during amylopectin recrystallization. The remaining crystal seed had an A-type structure and no significant effect on amylopectin retrogradation. Therefore, it was speculated that pure amylopectin retrograded by forming nuclei with a B-type structure, and the nuclei formed subsequently induced adjacent chains to form the eventual starch crystal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available