4.7 Article

Pancreatic lipase and ?-amylase inhibitory activity of extracts from selected plant materials after gastrointestinal digestion in vitro

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 355, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129414

Keywords

Obesity; Diabetes; Digestive enzymes; Gastrointestinal digestion; Proanthocyanidins

Funding

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [UMO-2016/23/D/NZ7/00958]
  2. European Regional Development Fund within the Operational Programme 'Innovative economy'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated inhibitory effects of fractions obtained from Chaenomeles japonica and Hippophae rhamnoides extracts on pancreatic lipase and α-amylase activities after artificial gastrointestinal digestion. The main active constituents were procyanidins and isorhamnetin derivatives in the extracts, correlating with significant inhibitory activity.
A screening of inhibitory activity of ?-amylase, as well as pancreatic lipase (PL), under the influence of aqueous and ethanolic preparations from 12 plant materials was performed. The most active aqueous extracts from the fruits of Chaenomeles japonica (CJ) and Hippophae? rhamnoides (HR) were selected for artificial gastrointestinal digestion (GID). The aim of this study was to evaluate the inhibitory effect of the fractions obtained after GID on PL and ?-amylase activities using a fluorescence assay. The changes in the composition of crude extracts in GID aliquots were followed by analysis with HPLC-DAD-MSn method in order to indicate active constituents. The main constituents of CJ and HR extracts were procyanidins and isorhamnetin derivatives, respectively. The most abundant compounds of extracts were found in all compartments of the digestion model correlated with relevant lipase/?-amylase inhibitory activity. What is more, the gastric and intestinal fractions inhibited enzymatic activity by at least 40%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available