4.4 Article

Dilution of QuEChERS Extracts Without Cleanup Improves Results in the UHPLC-MS/MS Multiresidue Analysis of Pesticides in Tomato

Journal

FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages 1511-1523

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-020-01921-1

Keywords

Pesticide residues; Tomato; QuEChERS; LC-MS; MS

Funding

  1. National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple multiresidue method using UHPLC-MS/MS was established and validated for the detection of 129 pesticides and metabolites in tomato samples without cleanup step. The method showed satisfactory results in practical analysis with minimal matrix effects for most compounds.
Tomato is well-known to be one of the most cultivated and consumed vegetables worldwide and frequently contain pesticide residues. Therefore, a simple multiresidue method was established and validated to determine 129 pesticides and metabolites in tomato samples using a modified acetate QuEChERS without cleanup for sample preparation and determination by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Dilution of the raw extract in different proportions of mobile phase was evaluated and a dilution of 10 times presented adequate results improving analysis performance while minimizing the matrix effect. Validation performed according to SANTE guideline presented satisfactory results. Practical method limit of quantification was 0.01 mg kg(-1) for most compounds. Recoveries between 70 and 120% with precision <= 20% were found for most compounds and spike levels evaluated. Matrix effect results were not significant for most part of compounds. Method proved to be simple, robust, and effective to be applied in routine analysis. Method applicability was performed by analysis of samples commercialized in Brazil and positive results were found demonstrating the importance of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available