4.5 Article

Experimental study at reduced-scale of fire spread between electrical cabinets located opposite each other

Journal

FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103319

Keywords

Clear PMMA; Electrical cabinets; Fire spread; Heat flux; Ignition; Overhead electric cable tray; Tempered glass; Transmittance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability of a fire in an electrical cabinet to spread to neighboring cabinets in nuclear power plant settings is a major concern for fire safety. Tests have shown that the materials used for front panels in opposite enclosures play a significant role in determining fire spread conditions. Factors such as separation distance, target type, and overhead electric cable trays also influence fire spread conditions.
The ability of an electrical cabinet fire to spread to neighbouring cabinets is a major concern for fire safety in nuclear power plants. Twelve intermediate-scale fire tests were performed to determine the fire spread conditions (FSCs) from a burning enclosure (BE) to an opposite enclosure (OE) equipped with either a non-combustible (glazed or metallic) or a combustible (poly(methyl methacrylate), PMMA) front panel. The effects on the FSCs of the separation distance (SD) between the enclosures, the target type (electrical component) contained in the OE and overhead electric cable trays were also investigated. Fire spread to the OE equipped with a glazed panel when the total transmitted heat flux led to the spontaneous ignition of the target. This outcome was not obtained for the metallic panel. For the PMMA panel, fire spread when flames coming from the BE reached the flammable gas mixture produced by the panel. For both glazed and PMMA panels, the FSCs were obtained for higher SDs when overhead electric cable trays were used. The tests also revealed that the faster and more powerful PMMA panel fire was not obtained for the minimum SD studied. Finally, total transmittances of the glazed and PMMA panels were assessed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available