4.2 Review

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes following Prenatal Diagnosis of Isolated Corpus Callosum Agenesis: A Systematic Review

Journal

FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 88-95

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000512534

Keywords

Abnormalities of corpus callosum; Neurodevelopmental outcomes; Prenatal counseling; Isolated corpus callosum abnormalities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on prenatal diagnosis, children with isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum generally have normal neurodevelopmental outcomes, but mild to severe issues may still arise in about one-third of cases.
Abnormalities of corpus callosum are one of the most common brain anomalies. Fetuses with isolated corpus callosum agenesis (CCA) have a better prognosis than those with additional anomalies. However, unpredictable neurodevelopmental outcomes of truly isolated CCA make prenatal counseling a challenge. The aim of this review is to evaluate neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with prenatal diagnosis of isolated CCA. Controlled clinical trials published between May 23, 2009, and May 23, 2019, using the MeSH term agenesis of corpus callosum were reviewed. A total of 942 articles were identified, and 8 studies were included in the systematic review depending on the inclusion criteria. These studies included 217 fetuses with isolated CCA and no other anomalies at prenatal assessment. Neurodevelopmental outcome was reported to be normal in 83 children with a prenatal diagnosis of isolated CCA confirmed at birth within 128 completed assessments. About 45 children presented borderline, moderate, or severe neurodevelopmental outcome. In this review, neurodevelopment was favorable in two-thirds of the cases, but mild disabilities emerged in older children. Despite this, disabilities can occur later beyond school age and a low risk of severe cognitive impairment exists. Our study highlights the essential early diagnosis and proper supportive therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available