4.6 Article

Validation of a portable, non-mydriatic fundus camera compared to gold standard dilated fundus examination using slit lamp biomicroscopy for assessing the optic disc for glaucoma

Journal

EYE
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 441-447

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01485-2

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a portable non-mydriatic fundus camera for assessing glaucoma. The results showed high sensitivity and specificity of the camera for diagnosing glaucoma remotely, suggesting it as an effective tool for community outreach programs.
Purpose To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a portable non-mydriatic fundus camera to assess the optic disc for glaucoma. Methods We conducted a single-site, cross-sectional, observational, instrument validation study. Non-mydriatic fundus photographs centred at the optic disc were obtained from 276 eyes of 68 glaucoma and 70 normal patients, using a portable fundus camera (Smartscope, Optomed, Oulu, Finland). A senior Glaucoma consultant, masked to the patient's study participation, performed a gold standard dilated fundus examination to make the diagnosis of glaucoma. Following this, a mydriatic photograph was taken by a standard table-top fundus camera. All the images were digitalized and de-identified by an independent investigator and presented to two remote graders, masked to the patients, their diagnoses, and photographic modality. Based on individual disc characteristics, a diagnosis of screening positive or negative for glaucoma was made. In the end, the independent investigator re-identified the images. Sensitivity and specificity to detect glaucoma with the undilated Smartscope camera was calculated compared to dilated fundus examination. Results Grading remote images taken with the portable non-mydriatic fundus camera showed a sensitivity of 96.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 91.6-98.8%) and 94.8% (95% CI: 89.7-97.9%) and a specificity of 98.5% (95% CI: 94.9-99.8%) and 97.8% (95% CI: 93.9-99.6%) for the two graders respectively as compared to gold standard dilated fundus examination. Conclusion The non-mydriatic Smartscope fundus images have high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing glaucoma remotely and thus may be an effective tool for use in community outreach programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available