4.7 Article

Ensemble Belief Rule-Based Model for complex system classification and prediction

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113952

Keywords

BRB model; Bagging framework; Ensemble learning; Classification; Prediction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71901212, 71671186, 71690233]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Ensemble-BRB model proposed in this paper aims to address the combinatorial explosion problem in the BRB model by downsizing the belief rule base using the bagging framework. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of this method in classification and prediction tasks, demonstrating its ability to significantly reduce the size of the BRB model while maintaining high modeling accuracy.
Belief Rule-Based (BRB) model has been widely used for complex system classification and prediction. However, excessive antecedent attributes will cause the combinatorial explosion problem, which restricts the applicability of the BRB model to high-dimensional problems. In this paper, we propose an Ensemble-BRB model with the use of the bagging framework to downsize the belief rule base and avoid the combinatorial explosion problem. The kernel of the Ensemble-BRB model is to generate several weak BRBs orderly, each of which only consists of a subset of antecedent attributes. Different combination methods can be used to integrate these weak BRBs coherently for classification and prediction respectively. Four benchmark problems are tested to validate the efficiency of the proposed Ensemble-BRB model in classification, and a real case on the health index prediction of engines proves the feasibility of the Ensemble-BRB model in prediction. The results on both classification and prediction show that the Ensemble-BRB model can effectively downsize the BRB as well as reach a high modeling accuracy.y

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available