4.5 Article

A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Offshore Wind Farm Layouts and Electric Infrastructures

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en9030216

Keywords

offshore wind farms; wind farm designers; trade-offs; multi-objective optimization; economic functions; design parameters

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation of the Netherlands within the EOS-LT program of Agentschap-NL [P201101-005-ECN]
  2. Funding Agency Grant CONICYT-FONDECYT [11150069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current offshore wind farms (OWFs) design processes are based on a sequential approach which does not guarantee system optimality because it oversimplifies the problem by discarding important interdependencies between design aspects. This article presents a framework to integrate, automate and optimize the design of OWF layouts and the respective electrical infrastructures. The proposed framework optimizes simultaneously different goals (e.g., annual energy delivered and investment cost) which leads to efficient trade-offs during the design phase, e.g., reduction of wake losses vs collection system length. Furthermore, the proposed framework is independent of economic assumptions, meaning that no a priori values such as the interest rate or energy price, are needed. The proposed framework was applied to the Dutch Borssele areas I and II. A wide range of OWF layouts were obtained through the optimization framework. OWFs with similar energy production and investment cost as layouts designed with standard sequential strategies were obtained through the framework, meaning that the proposed framework has the capability to create different OWF layouts that would have been missed by the designers. In conclusion, the proposed multi-objective optimization framework represents a mind shift in design tools for OWFs which allows cost savings in the design and operation phases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available