4.7 Article

The bradycardic agent ivabradine decreases conduction velocity in the AV node and in the ventricles in-vivo

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 893, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173818

Keywords

Ivabradine; Bradycardic agents; Electrocardiography; Cardiac impulse conduction; Arrhythmia

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund [P210006-B11, W1232-B11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that ivabradine can decrease heart rate and atrial conduction velocity, as well as prolong ventricular conduction time.
Ivabradine blocks hyperpolarisation-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, thereby lowering the heart rate, an action that is used clinically for the treatment of heart failure and angina pectoris. We and others have shown previously that ivabradine, in addition to its HCN channel blocking activity, also inhibits voltage-gated Na channels in vitro at concentrations that may be clinically relevant. Such action may reduce conduction velocity in cardiac atria and ventricles. Here, we explore the effect of administration of ivabradine on parameters of ventricular conduction and repolarization in the surface ECG of anesthetized mice. We found that 5 min after i.p. administration of 10 mg/kg ivabradine spontaneous heart rate had declined by similar to 13%, which is within the range observed in human clinical studies. At the same time a significant increase in QRS duration by similar to 18% was observed, suggesting a reduction in ventricular conduction velocity. During transesophageal pacing at heart rates between 100 and 220 beats/min there was no obvious rate-dependence of ivabradine-induced QRS prolongation. On the other hand, ivabradine produced substantial rate-dependent slowing of AV nodal conduction. We conclude that ivabradine prolongs conduction in the AV-node and in the ventricles in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available