4.5 Article

EEG in motion: Using an oddball task to explore motor interference in active skateboarding

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 54, Issue 12, Pages 8196-8213

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15163

Keywords

cognitive– motor interference; ERP; mobile EEG; naturalistic cognition; portable research

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Alberta Faculty of Science Startup
  2. Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RES0024267]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advancements in portable computer devices have allowed for studying human cognition in real-world scenarios, such as using an electric skateboard on an indoor running track. The study found reliable differences in event-related potentials during the auditory oddball task on the skateboard. Results indicated that increased riding difficulty during skateboard motion did not affect cognitive resources.
Recent advancements in portable computer devices have opened new avenues in the study of human cognition outside research laboratories. This flexibility in methodology has led to the publication of several electroencephalography studies recording brain responses in real-world scenarios such as cycling and walking outside. In the present study, we tested the classic auditory oddball task while participants moved around an indoor running track using an electric skateboard. This novel approach allows for the study of attention in motion while virtually removing body movement. Using the skateboard auditory oddball paradigm, we found reliable and expected standard-target differences in the P3 and MMN/N2b event-related potentials. We also recorded baseline electroencephalography activity and found that, compared to this baseline, alpha power is attenuated in frontal and parietal regions during skateboarding. In order to explore the influence of motor interference in cognitive resources during skateboarding, we compared participants' preferred riding stance (baseline level of riding difficulty) versus their non-preferred stance (increased level of riding difficulty). We found that an increase in riding difficulty did not modulate the P3 and tonic alpha amplitude during skateboard motion. These results suggest that increases in motor demands might not lead to reductions in cognitive resources as shown in previous literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available