4.5 Article

Heterozygous COL9A3 variants cause severe peripheral vitreoretinal degeneration and retinal detachment

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 881-886

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00820-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ophthalmic Research Institute of Australia
  2. NSW Office of Health and Medical Research, Retina New Zealand
  3. Save Sight Society New Zealand, NHMRC [1116360]
  4. Sydney Eye Hospital Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COL9A3 gene variants are known to cause multiple epiphyseal dysplasia and Stickler syndrome, but this report is the first to link these variants to peripheral vitreoretinal lattice degeneration and retinal detachment.
The COL9A3 gene encodes one of the three alpha chains of Type IX collagen, with heterozygous variants reported to cause multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, and suggested as contributory in some cases of sensorineural hearing loss. Patients with homozygous variants have midface hypoplasia, myopia, sensorineural hearing loss, epiphyseal changes and carry a diagnosis of Stickler syndrome. Variants in COL9A3 have not previously been reported to cause vitreoretinal degeneration and/or retinal detachments. This report describes two families with autosomal dominant inheritance and predominant features of peripheral vitreoretinal lattice degeneration and retinal detachment. Genomic sequencing revealed a heterozygous splice variant in COL9A3 [NG_016353.1(NM_001853.4):c.1107 + 1G>C, NC_000020.10(NM_001853.4):c.1107 + 1G>C, LRG1253t1] in Family 1, and a heterozygous missense variant [NG_016353.1(NM_001853.4):c.388G>A p.(Gly130Ser)] in Family 2, each segregating with disease. cDNA studies of the splice variant demonstrated an in-frame deletion in the COL2 domain, and the missense variant occurred in the COL3 domain, both indicating the critical role of Type IX collagen in the vitreous base of the eye.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available