4.4 Article

An analysis of energy detector based on improved approximations of the chi-square distributions

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s13638-021-01915-5

Keywords

Cognitive radio; Spectrum sensing; Energy detector

Funding

  1. Federal University of Parana Foundation [04/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Closed-form expressions for detection probability, false alarm probability, and energy detector constant threshold are derived using approximations of central and non-central chi-square distributions, showing closer proximity to original functions than expressions used in literature. These novel expressions provide gains up to 6% and 16% in false alarm and miss-detection probabilities, respectively, compared to the Central Limit Theorem approach, and enhance the throughput of cognitive networks by up to 9%. New equations are presented to minimize total error rate for detection threshold and optimal sample size, with analytical results matching simulation results across a wide range of SNR values.
Closed-form expressions for the detection probability, the false alarm probability and the energy detector constant threshold are derived using approximations of the central chi-square and non-central chi-square distributions. The approximations used show closer proximity to the original functions when compared to the expressions used in the literature. The novel expressions allow gains up to 6% and 16% in terms of measured false alarm and miss-detection probability, respectively, if compared to the Central Limit Theorem approach. The throughput of cognitive network is also enhanced when these novel expressions are implemented, providing gains up to 9%. New equations are also presented that minimize the total error rate to obtain the detection threshold and the optimal number of samples. The analytical results match the results of the simulation for a wide range of SNR values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available