4.8 Article

A Searchable Database for Prediction of Emission Compositions from Upstream Oil and Gas Sources

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 3210-3218

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05925

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Collaboratory to Advance Methane Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a database that allows estimation of hydrocarbon compositions in oil and gas production emissions by querying well parameters. Results show significant variations in emission compositions, especially in the ethane to methane ratio.
Atmospheric emissions from oil and gas production operations are composed of multiple hydrocarbons and can have large variations in composition. Accurate estimates of emission compositions are needed to estimate the fate and impacts of emissions and to attribute emissions to sources. This work presents a database, constructed with empirical data and thermodynamic models, that can be queried to estimate hydrocarbon compositions from emission sources present at oil and gas production sites. The database can be searched for matches using between two and seven well parameters as query inputs (gas-to-oil ratio, API gravity, separator pressure, separator temperature, methane molar fraction in produced gas, ethane molar fraction of produced gas, and propane molar fraction in produced gas). Database query performance was characterized by comparing returns from database queries to a test data set. Application of the database to well parameters for tens of thousands of wells in the Barnett, Eagle Ford, and Fayetteville production regions demonstrates variations in emission compositions. Ethane to methane ratio varies by more than an order of magnitude from well to well and source to source. VOC to methane ratios are comparable in variability to ethane to methane ratios for most emission sources, but have a higher variability for emissions from flashing of liquid hydrocarbon tanks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available