4.8 Article

Characterizing Nitrogen Oxides and Fine Particulate Matter near Major Highways in the United States Using the National Near-Road Monitoring Network

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 2831-2838

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05851

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study used spatial interpolation to estimate the near-road concentration increments of NO2 and PM2.5 across the United States from 2013 to 2018, revealing distinct diurnal cycles in pollutant levels. Analysis of a quasi-near-road site also showed gradual decreases in NO2 and PM2.5 increments over time.
As part of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) review, a national network of near-road sites was established to characterize pollutant behavior, interaction, and dispersion in the ambient near-road environment. Using spatial interpolation to estimate the near-road concentration increments of NO2 and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 mu m and less (PM2.5) relative to nearby non-near-road monitors, we found that the 2013-2018 national average increment is 6.9 ppb and 1.0 mu g m(-3) for NO2 and PM2.5, respectively. Analyses of the hourly near-road NO2, nitric oxide (NO), and PM2.5 increments showed distinct diurnal cycles; the NO2 increment peaks at similar to 9 ppb during the early afternoon (2-4 pm local time) while the NO and PM2.5 increments peak during the morning rush hour (5-8 am local time) at 25 ppb and 1.8 mu g m(-3) for NO and PM2.5, respectively. Although long-term trends are not yet available for this network of sites, a similar analysis of the NO2 and PM2.5 increment at a quasi-near-road site outside of the official network in Elizabeth, NJ showed gradual decreases in the increment over time since the mid-2000s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available