Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 2541-2552Publisher
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05274
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2020R1A2C2011951]
- U.S. National Science Foundation [CBET-1254929]
- Allan & Inger Osberg Endowed Professorship
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study investigated the degradation kinetics of antibiotic resistance genes using different disinfectants, revealing varied degradation mechanisms for different types of ARGs. Furthermore, differences in degradation rates for extracellular and intracellular ARGs were observed at different oxidant exposures, possibly due to decreased DNA recovery efficiency and/or the presence of MRSA aggregates protected from disinfectants.
Degradation kinetics of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) by free available chlorine (FAC), ozone (O-3), and UV254 light (UV) were investigated in phosphate buffered solutions at pH 7 using a chromosomal ARG (mecA) of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). For FAC, the degradation rates of extracellular mecA (extra-mecA) were accelerated with increasing FAC exposure, which could be explained by a two-step FAC reaction model. The degradation of extra-mecA by O-3 followed second-order reaction kinetics. The degradation of extra-mecA by UV exhibited tailing kinetics, which could be described by a newly proposed kinetic model considering cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) formation, its photoreversal, and irreversible (6-4) photoproduct formation. Measured rate constants for extra-mecA increased linearly with amplicon length for FAC and O-3, or with number of intrastrand pyrimidine doublets for UV, which enabled prediction of degradation rate constants of extra-mecA amplicons based on sequence length and/or composition. In comparison to those of extra-mecA, the observed degradation rates of intracellular mecA (intra-mecA) were faster for FAC and O-3 at low oxidant exposures but significantly slower at high exposures for FAC and UV. Differences in observed extra- and intracellular kinetics could be due to decreased DNA recovery efficiency and/or the presence of MRSA aggregates protected from disinfectants.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available