4.7 Article

Getting ahead of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in US hogs

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 196, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110954

Keywords

Antibiotic resistance; Livestock-adaptation; Staphylococcus aureus; One health; Hogs

Funding

  1. NSF of the joint NSF-NIH-USDA Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases program [1316318]
  2. American Association of University Women Selected Professions Fellowship Program
  3. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [T32ES007018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that industrial hog operations are more likely to carry multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus compared to hogs raised without antibiotics. Conversely, antibiotic-free hogs are more likely to carry human-adapted S. aureus. This highlights the influence of antibiotic use practices on S. aureus populations in U.S. hogs and calls for increased monitoring for antibiotic resistance management.
Antibiotic-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus, an opportunistic bacterial pathogen, have emerged in industrial livestock operations and agricultural settings. In the United States, there is limited access to industrial livestock operations and farm-level antibiotic use data. As a result, studies often rely on retail meat as a proxy for direct animal sampling. To move beyond this limitation and assess S. aureus colonization in hogs, we purchased the heads of recently-slaughtered hogs and compared S. aureus populations in those raised on industrial hog operations versus those raised without antibiotics. S. aureus isolates were analyzed for antibiotic resistance and putative genotypic markers of livestock adaptation. Although methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was not detected in this study, all of the hogs from industrial hog operations (n = 9/9) carried multidrug-resistant S. aureus (MDRSA) with two livestock-adaptation markers (scn-negative and clonal complex (CC) 9 or 398) compared to 11% of hogs raised without antibiotics (n = 1/9). Hogs from industrial operations were 9.0 times (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4?57.1) as likely to carry livestock-adapted S. aureus and 4.5 times (95% CI: 1.3?15.3) as likely to carry MDRSA as hogs raised without antibiotics. In contrast, the majority of antibiotic-free hogs (67%, n = 6/9) contained human-adapted S. aureus (i.e. scn-positive, CC1) compared to 11% (n = 1/9) of IHO hogs. These results indicate that antibiotic use in IHO hogs may make them more conducive hosts to antibiotic-resistant, livestock-adapted S. aureus strains when compared to hogs raised without antibiotics. Our results are important, as they provide strong evidence that antibiotic use practices influence the S. aureus populations carried by U.S. hogs, supporting the need for increased access to routine monitoring of hog operations for antibiotic resistance management using a One Health framework.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available