4.7 Article

Impacts of off-road vehicle tracks on runoff, erosion and sediment delivery - A combined field and modeling approach

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104957

Keywords

Connectivity; Off-road vehicles; Erosion; Coral; Sediment yield; Tropics

Funding

  1. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation's Coral Reef Conservation Fund program (2016
  2. NFWF) [0302.16.053108]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that off-road vehicle (ORV) tracks significantly contribute to sediment pollution in coral reefs and coastal wetlands in dry tropical areas. Empirical and modeling approaches revealed that ORV track erosion rates are much higher than background erosion rates. A new sediment connectivity model accurately predicts watershed-scale sediment yield from ORV tracks, providing a method for quantifying sediment contributions at specific sites.
Assessing the effects of land disturbance on sediment yield requires quantification of erosion and sediment connectivity. Off-road vehicle (ORV) tracks represent sources of sediment pollution to coral reefs and coastal wetlands in a dry tropical setting of Southwestern Puerto Rico. This study assesses their contribution through a combined empirical and modeling approach. Rainfall simulation experiments and sediment accumulation in detention ponds indicate that ORV track erosion rates are 31-83 Mg ha(-1)yr(-1) and these are one to two orders of magnitude greater than background erosion rates. A new sediment connectivity model predicted a watershed-scale sediment yield of 2.7 Mg ha(-1)yr(-1) from a 11.9 km km(-2) of ORV track network, and this exceeds those from comparable watersheds in the Caribbean. The spatially explicit nature of the model outputs allows for site-specific quantification of sediment contributions and for an evaluation of the effectiveness of mitigation methods such as detention ponds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available