4.1 Article

Parental relatedness and parasitoid sex ratios under local mate competition

Journal

ENTOMOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 137-142

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ens.12461

Keywords

brood sex ratio; Goniozus legneri; kin discrimination; sex ratio variance

Categories

Funding

  1. Islamic Development Bank PhD Scholarship [600031484]
  2. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The experiment found that mating with siblings or males from the same strain is more likely to result in biased sex ratios towards females in parasitoid wasps, while mating with males from a different strain tends to lead to a more balanced sex ratio among offspring.
Sex ratio theory predicts that, under local mate competition, a more female-biased offspring sex ratio will be produced by females when their relatedness to their mates is closer. We assess how the sexual composition of broods responds to mother-mate relatedness using Goniozus legneri Gordh (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae), a parasitoid wasp that has biased sex ratios due to local mate competition. Relatedness was varied by providing virgin females with a mate that was either a sibling, a non-sibling from the same strain, from a strain with geographically similar origin or from a strain with geographically distant origin. The sex ratios among broods produced by mothers that had mated with a sibling or a same-strain male were similar and were more biased than broods produced by females mated with males from a different strain. Brood sex variances were higher after mating with different-strain males. Previous evaluations of parasitoid sex ratio responses to mate relatedness have not found the patterns predicted, possibly because the species investigated can control progeny sex ratio but cannot discriminate kin. In contrast, female G. legneri appear to possess both these abilities and appears to respond to mate relatedness in qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available