4.7 Article

A novel method for the determination of the interface strength with coarse meshes for laminated composite materials

Journal

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
Volume 242, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107469

Keywords

Fracture process zone; Delamination; Finite element analysis; Interface strength; Elastic restraint beam model

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11572152]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a novel method for accurately determining interface strength in simulating Mode I delamination, and for predicting FPZ length more accurately when using coarse meshes. Additionally, it reveals that the constant cohesive law is more suitable for simulating delamination with coarse meshes than the bi-linear cohesive law. This method is applicable to various structure thicknesses and material properties in composite materials.
The presence of sufficient elements within the fracture process zone (FPZ) ahead of the crack tip is crucial for accurate analysis of composite delamination in using cohesive elements. However, it may lead to extremely high computational costs in the finite element analysis of large-scale structures. Using coarse meshes can reduce such costs, but accurately determining interface strength is important for improving the accuracy of the analysis. In this paper, a novel method is proposed which can determine a more suitable interface strength for the simulation of Mode I delamination than existing methods found in open literature. Meanwhile, the proposed method can predict FPZ length more accurately when coarse meshes are used. Furthermore, this study found that constant cohesive law is more suitable for simulating delamination in the use of coarse meshes than bi-linear cohesive law. Finally, for composite materials, this method can be applied to various structure thicknesses and material properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available