4.7 Article

Analysis of ductile damage changes of pipelines with unconstrained dents in rebound process

Journal

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105071

Keywords

Unconstrained dents; Oyane ductile fracture criterion; Ductile damage; Dent depth

Funding

  1. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2020YJ0153]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study conducted numerical simulations to investigate the rebound process of unconstrained dents in X52 steel pipes during service, and studied the ductile damage degree of dented pipes affected by multiple factors based on the Oyane ductile fracture criterion. The results showed that the ductile damage model can be used for safety evaluation of dented pipelines.
Dent is one of the most common defects in mechanical damage of oil and gas pipelines. Most of the dents generated during pipeline construction are unconstrained dents, and rebound will occur during service of the pipeline. The dent defect can be considered as ductile damage. Taking X52 steel pipe as the research object, the rebound process of unconstrained dents in service is numerically simulated. Based on the Oyane ductile fracture criterion, the ductile damage degree of dented pipes affected by multiple factors was studied. The change of the ductile damage integral value with the change of parameters during each loading process of the pipeline and the relationship between the pipeline damage and the depth of the dent were analyzed. The results show that the analysis results based on the ductile damage model are in accordance with the conclusions of the existing research, and the ductile damage integral value of the pipeline changes with the depth of the dent in a reasonable law, which shows that the ductile fracture criterion can be used for the safety evaluation of dented pipeline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available