4.7 Article

Tension in Mexico's energy transition: Are urban residential consumers in Aguascalientes willing to pay for renewable energy and green jobs?

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112145

Keywords

Renewable energy sources; Green jobs; Just energy transition; Discrete choice experiment; Aguascalientes; Mexico

Funding

  1. Fondo Sectorial CONACYT-SENER Sustentabilidad Energetica, Mexico [247006, 245750]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that urban residents are willing to pay extra for renewable energy and new jobs in the renewable energy sector, with a higher willingness to pay for solar energy compared to biomass energy. The results suggest that respondents support a just energy transition aiming to boost both renewable energy sources and the creation of green jobs, given the current tension in Mexico due to the energy strategy pursued by the federal administration.
Via a discrete choice experiment (DCE), a sample of urban residents that contribute to their household electricity bill in Aguascalientes, Mexico, has been asked to choose from among four electricity contracts -a status quo alternative, and three alternatives described in terms of type of renewable energy source (RES), % of RES in current electricity mix, new jobs in RE sector, and % increase in self-reported bimonthly electricity bill. Respondents report a positive willingness to pay (WTP) for both RES and new jobs in RE sector, and a higher WTP for solar energy in comparison to biomass energy. These results are timely as there is a tension in Mexico due to the energy strategy pursued by the current federal administration -which in practice has slowed down the energy transition initiated in 2015. This paper's findings suggest that respondents to our DCE would support a just energy transition aiming to boost both RES and the creation of green jobs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available