4.7 Article

Pyrolysis-catalysis of different waste plastics over Fe/Al2O3 catalyst: High-value hydrogen, liquid fuels, carbon nanotubes and possible reaction mechanisms

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 229, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113794

Keywords

Waste plastics; Pyrolysis-catalysis; High-value products; Correlation; Reaction mechanisms

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1901204]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51906082, 51861130362]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M662617]
  4. Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion [FSKLCCB2001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the pyrolysis-catalysis of various waste plastics with an Fe/Al2O3 catalyst was investigated in order to understand the correlation between plastic structure and products, as well as possible reaction mechanisms. The results showed differences in gaseous and liquid products from different types of plastics, with HIPS and GPPS leading to higher solid carbon deposits.
To understand the correlation between plastic structure and products, and the possible reaction mechanisms, the pyrolysis-catalysis of different types of waste plastics was investigated in the presence of an Fe/Al2O3 catalyst. Polypropylene (PP), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high-impact polystyrene (HIPS), and general-purpose polystyrene (GPPS) were used as the feedstock. The results showed that PP, HDPE, and LDPE showed higher H-2-enriched gaseous product yields (>40 wt%), but higher H-2 concentration (over 70 vol%) was obtained from the gaseous products of HIPS and GPPS. In terms of liquid oil, the yield exhibited a relatively stable tendency, which was similar to 20 wt%, and the liquid product comprised hydrocarbons with a carbon number range mainly between 8 and 16. For solid carbon deposits, HIPS waste plastic led to a higher solid deposit yield of 49.4 wt%, followed by GPPS of 48.7 wt%. By contrast, PP, HDPE, and LDPE showed lower yields of 30.2 wt%, 36.9 wt%, and 35.9 wt%, respectively. In summary, more, purer and cleaner carbon nanotubes (CNTs) could be obtained from pyrolysis-catalysis of polyolefin (PP and PE), while more amorphous carbon and hydrogen were gathered from PS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available