4.7 Article

An original multi-criteria decision-making algorithm for solar panels selection in buildings

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 217, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119396

Keywords

Multi-criteria decision-making; TOPSIS; Self-sufficiency; Smart buildings; Solar energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an original multi-criteria decision-making algorithm based on Rank-Weight-Rank concept for selecting the best solar panels. Compared to TOPSIS method, our approach demonstrates advantages in terms of simulation time and selection accuracy.
Nowadays, there are several thousand solar panels (SP) in the market. These panels vary in size, efficiency, cost, warranty, technology, etc. Selecting the best SP becomes complicated when other factors are added to the list, such as the available roof area, weather conditions, electricity tariffs, energy consumptions, etc. Therefore, it becomes crucial to propose an algorithm that selects the best SP for a specific client and provides the best combination of quality-cost-satisfaction. This paper presents an original multi-criteria decision-making algorithm based on the concept of Rank-Weight-Rank to select the best SP by considering many criteria. For validation purposes, our method is compared to TOPSIS, and it shows advantages, especially regarding the simulation time and the accuracy of the selection. Our approach is faster than TOPSIS, and the speed of finding the solution increases exponentially when the number of criteria and alternatives increases. Moreover, it is reliable and accurate since the probability is more than 78% for similarity of 90%-100% between both methods in selecting the same best alternative. Results show that the highest SP efficiency and the most expensive ones are not the best alternatives, nor the lowest efficient neither the cheapest SPs are the worst alternatives. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available