CO2 capture cost saving through waste heat recovery using transport membrane condenser in different solvent-based carbon capture processes

In this study, the waste heat from the hot stripping gas was recovered by adopting the transport membrane condenser (TMC) in the monoethanolamine (MEA)-, diethanolamine (DEA)-, piperazine (PZ)- and potassium glycinate (PG)-based rich-split modified carbon capture processes. A 220-h test showed that TMC can exhibit a good stability on the waste heat recovery performance. The PZ-based TMC-modified rich-split process (i.e., PZ-case) achieved a highest waste heat recovery performance, followed by the PG-case, MEA-case and DEA-case. A strong linear relationship between the heat and water fluxes was observed during the waste heat recovery. Three scenarios were considered for comparing the CO2 capture cost savings of 4 cases. When the TMC area was fixed meaning the same additional investment of rich-split modification, PZ-case gained the highest CO2 capture cost saving ($6.40/t-CO2), followed by PG, MEA- and DEA-case. When a fixed waste heat recovery performance of 600 kJ/kg-CO2 was required for obtaining the same revenue after rich- split modification, PZ- and PG-case obtained the same CO2 capture cost saving of $4.22/t-CO2. Moreover, when the reboiler duty reduction potential was aimed at 15%, PG-case achieved the maximum CO2 capture cost saving ($4.56/t-CO2). (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

The waste heat from hot stripping gas was recovered using transport membrane condenser (TMC) in different carbon capture processes. The PZ-based TMC-modified rich-split process achieved the highest waste heat recovery performance and cost savings for CO2 capture. The linear relationship between heat and water fluxes during waste heat recovery was observed.