4.7 Article

Improving the gasoline properties by blending butanol-Al2O3 to optimize the engine performance and reduce air pollution

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 218, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119442

Keywords

Additives; Nano-particles; Pollution; Gasoline; Butanol; Al2O3

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that adding additives such as butanol and alumina to pure gasoline can improve engine performance, including increasing power output and reducing emissions of CO, hydrocarbons, and NOx. Optimization results show that using 5% butanol and 1 g of alumina can achieve better results.
In this study, butanol, as an oxygenate additive and alumina as a nano metal particle, was mixed with pure gasoline. Different blends were tested, and operational tests were done on an engine with different engine speeds. Those additives were added to decrease air pollution due to the higher oxygen content of butanol, which can make combustion more complete, and nano metal additive, which has suitable potential to enhance engine performance, especially Brake Specific Fuel Consumption (BSFC). The results indicate that adding the additives mentioned above to the pure gasoline has led to an increase the engine performance. In this regard, the engine power has increased by 10% by adding alumina. Moreover, combining the base gasoline with additives enhances CO2 and reduces NOx and emissions of hydrocarbons. In this research, carbon monoxide was diminished by adding alcohol up to 50% in some conditions, and the emitted hydrocarbons through the atmosphere were declined by up to 20%. Moreover, optimization results showed that higher optimization is achieved when 5% of butanol and 1 g of alumina are used. Under these conditions, the results of CO, CO2, NOx and HC emissions were 1.099, 4.699, 113.9 and 77.5 ppm, respectively. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available