4.7 Article

The simulation and analysis of wood fuel low-grade heat

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 218, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119501

Keywords

Wood fuel; Low-grade heat; Flue gas composition; Heat pump

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modern wood fuel plants produce flue gas with significant moisture content, requiring additional energy and investment for utilization of low-grade heat through mechanical heat pump technology. The heat carried by the flue gas depends on its heat capacity and temperature, both parameters are interdependent and need to be calculated beforehand.
Modern wood fuel plants use freshly felled and chipped wood, so the flue gas contains a significant amount of vapour. Even after the condensing economizer, the flue gas carries out a considerable amount of heat ejected into the surroundings. It is impossible to use this heat for heating directly because it is too low grade. Additional energy and investment are needed for its utilization, e.g., using mechanical heat pump technology. The utilization effectiveness depends on the heat capacity that the flue gas carries out of the condensing economizer as well as on the temperature to which the gas is cooled down. These two parameters are interdependent and have to be calculated before designing the heat pump. The calculations and simulation of the wood fuel low-grade heat is quite sophisticated due to the fact that the composition of flue gas changes during its cooling process. This article presents a mathematic model of the calculations of flue gases. This model presents simulation and some results which could facilitate the evaluation of the effectiveness of the low-grade heat utilization using heat pump technology. The verification of results, presented in the article, shows correctness of the model and calculations' accuracy. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available