4.5 Article

High Performance Electric Vehicle Powertrain Modeling, Simulation and Validation

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14051493

Keywords

electric vehicle; chassis dynamometer; drive cycle; modeling

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate modeling, simulation, and validation of electric vehicle (EV) powertrains is crucial for critical design and control decisions in high performance vehicle designs. The methodology described in this paper combines MATLAB/Simulink software for modeling and simulation with real-world validation on a chassis dynamometer, demonstrating a cost-effective means of rapidly developing and validating high performance EV powertrains.
Accurate electric vehicle (EV) powertrain modeling, simulation and validation is paramount for critical design and control decisions in high performance vehicle designs. Described in this paper is a methodology for the design and development of EV powertrain through modeling, simulation and validation on a real-world vehicle system with detailed analysis of the results. Although simulation of EV powertrains in software simulation environments plays a significant role in the design and development of EVs, validating these models on the real-world vehicle systems plays an equally important role in improving the overall vehicle reliability, safety and performance. This modeling approach leverages the use of MATLAB/Simulink software for the modeling and simulation of an EV powertrain, augmented by simultaneously validating the modeling results on a real-world vehicle which is performance tested on a chassis dynamometer. The combination of these modeling techniques and real-world validation demonstrates a methodology for a cost effective means of rapidly developing and validating high performance EV powertrains, filling the literature gaps in how these modeling methodologies can be carried out in a research framework.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available