4.6 Article

Novel cryoballoon 180° ablation system for treatment of Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia: a first-in-human study

Journal

ENDOSCOPY
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 64-70

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-1381-7562

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pentax Medical of America, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 180-degree cryoballoon technology showed feasibility, safety, and effectiveness in the treatment of Barrett's esophagus neoplasia, with a high technical success rate of 96%. The initial dose resulted in a median BE regression of 94% without serious adverse events, and the overall regression rate was 80%.
Background The novel 180 degrees cryoballoon (CbAS (180) ) enables semicircumferential treatment over a length of 3cm per application. This first-in-human study evaluates its feasibility, efficacy, and safety for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE) neoplasia. Methods This multicenter study consisted of dose-finding and extension phases. Dose-finding started with the lowest dose possible (1.0mm/s). For each dose, six patients were treated circumferentially over a 3-cm length. The dose was increased until the median BE regression was >= 60% without serious adverse events (SAEs). In the extension phase, the dose was confirmed in 19 new patients. The outcomes were technical success, BE regression after one treatment, and SAEs. Results 25 patients (median Prague C0M3) were included (6 dose-finding/19 extension). In two patients, the CbAS (180) could not be applied because of unstable balloon positioning. The technical success rate was 96% (22/23). In the six dose-finding patients, the starting dose resulted in median BE regression of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60%-97%) without SAEs and was thus considered effective. Overall median BE regression was 80% (95%CI 60%-90%). Conclusion Single-session CbAS (180) seems feasible, safe, and effective, and is a promising technique for the treatment of patients with BE neoplasia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available