4.6 Article

An efficient barrier toward vanadium crossover in redox flow batteries: The bilayer [Nafion/(WO3)x] hybrid inorganic-organic membrane

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 378, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138133

Keywords

Hybrid inorganic-organic proton-conducting membranes; Nafion; Tungsten oxide; Vanadium redox flow batteries; Coulombic and energy efficiency

Funding

  1. ENI S.p.A. [1157, 2500026228]
  2. University of Padova [BIRD187913]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A family of hybrid inorganic-organic ion-exchange membranes (IEMs) has been prepared, showing improved performance in batteries with higher Coulombic efficiency, energy efficiency, and capacity retention in comparison to traditional Nafion 212 reference membranes. The asymmetrical nature of the hybrid IEMs has been correlated with their enhanced performance in a single-cell vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB).
A family of hybrid inorganic-organic ion-exchange membranes (IEMs) is prepared, indicated as [Nafion/(WO3)(x)]. The IEMs consist of Nafion (R) dispersing different loadings (x) of tungsten oxide nanofiller. Morphology studies carried out by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and micro-Raman investigations reveal that one side of each hybrid IEM exhibits a high concentration of the WO3 nanofiller. In the remaining part of each IEM the concentration of the filler is much lower and constant. The correlation between the asymmetrical nature and the performance of the hybrid IEMs is studied in a single-cell vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB). In comparison with the Nafion 212 reference, at the same current density of 50 mA.cm(-2), [Nafion/(WO3)(0.587)] demonstrates: (i) a higher Coulombic efficiency (93% vs. 88%), a higher energy efficiency (75% vs. 65%) and a higher capacity retention (62% vs. 42%). (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available