4.8 Editorial Material

The suggestion that landscapes should contain 40% of forest cover lacks evidence and is problematic

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 1112-1113

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13668

Keywords

Biodiversity crisis; conservation planning; extinction threshold; forest restoration; forest threshold; land-use planning

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A recent review suggests that forest cover needs to be restored or maintained on at least 40% of land area, but the lack of empirical evidence makes this suggestion unhelpful and potentially dangerous. It is advocated to establish regionally defined thresholds to guide conservation and restoration efforts.
A recent review suggests that forest cover needs to be restored or maintained on at least 40% of land area. In the absence of empirical evidence to support this threshold, we discuss how this suggestion is unhelpful and potentially dangerous. We advocate for regionally defined thresholds to inform conservation and restoration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available