4.8 Article

Floral resource diversification promotes solitary bee reproduction and may offset insecticide effects - evidence from a semi-field experiment

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 668-675

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13683

Keywords

Complementary resources; neonicotinoids; Osmia bicornis; plant diversity and identity; pollinator declines

Categories

Funding

  1. German Research Association (DFG) Research Training Group 1644 `Scaling Problems in Statistics' [152112243]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that in agricultural landscapes, wild plant diversity and identity effects can increase the reproduction of wild bees, offsetting the negative effects of neonicotinoid-treated oilseed rape on bee reproduction.
Pollinator declines in agricultural landscapes are driven by multiple stressors, but potential interactions of these remain poorly studied. Using a highly replicated semi-field study with 56 mesocosms of varying wild plant diversity (2-16 species) and oilseed rape treated with a neonicotinoid, we tested the interacting effects of resource diversity and insecticides on reproduction of a solitary wild bee. Compared to mesocosms with oilseed rape monocultures, availability of resources from wild plants complementing oilseed rape doubled brood cell production. In addition, bee reproduction increased due to plant diversity and identity effects. Exposure to neonicotinoid-treated oilseed rape reduced bee larval to adult development by 69%, but only in mesocosms with oilseed rape monocultures. Availability of complementary flower resources can thus offset negative effects of neonicotinoid-treated oilseed rape on wild bee reproduction. Policy should encourage the implementation of diverse floral resources mitigating negative effects of crop monocultures and insecticides, thereby sustaining solitary bee populations in agricultural landscapes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available