4.2 Article

Taking the next step: Improving care transitions from a first-episode psychosis service

Journal

EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 91-96

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eip.13127

Keywords

Care transitions; coordinated specialty care; early intervention; first‐ episode psychosis; quality improvement

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01MH103831]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study utilized a quality improvement approach (QI) to enhance patient disposition and transfer after discharge from First-episode services (FES). Through sustained efforts and improvements, the results showed significant enhancements in transfer status at 3 months post-discharge and disposition outcomes.
Aims First-episode services (FES) improve outcomes in recent onset psychosis, but there is growing concern about how patients fare after discharge from these time-limited services. Methods A quality improvement approach (QI) was used to improve patient engagement in the discharge planning process (disposition), and successful engagement in care 3 months after discharge from the FES (transfer). Data from 144 consecutive discharges over 62 months are presented. A planning phase was followed by recurrent Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles (PDSA) that included the introduction of proactive efforts targeting disposition planning (with patients and families) and follow-up to facilitate transfer after discharge. Fisher's exact test was used to compare disposition and transfer outcomes across the QI phases. Results This QI approach was sustained through a three-fold escalation in discharge volume. Transfer status at 3 months was significantly different between the pre- and post PDSA phases (p = .02). A greater proportion were confirmed transfers post-PDSA (54.3 vs. 37%), but of those with known status at 3 months, similar proportions were successfully transferred (76, 73%). Patients discharged post-PDSA were less likely to have unknown treatment status (26 vs. 51%). Disposition outcomes were also significantly improved post-PDSA (p = .03). Patients were more likely to engage with discharge planning (69.7 vs. 48.6%) and less likely to be lost to follow-up (13.8 vs. 25.7%), or to refuse assistance (11.0 vs. 20.0%). Conclusion This QI approach offers a feasible way to improve disposition and transfer after FES and can be built upon in efforts to sustain functional gains in onward pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available