4.4 Article

Electronic health record adoption among US substance use disorder and other mental health treatment facilities

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108515

Keywords

Electronic health records; Services; Substance use disorder; Mental health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that EHR adoption lags behind in US SUD facilities compared to MH facilities. Exclusive EHR use for clinical purposes remains limited in both facility types, with wide variability among states. Factors such as Joint Commission accreditation may help expedite EHR adoption in SUD treatment facilities.
Objective: This study examined Electronic Health Record (EHR) utilization among US substance use disorder (SUD) versus mental health (MH) treatment facilities. Methods: Data from the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services and the National Mental Health Services Survey were used to examine differences in clinical and administrative utilization of EHR. Results: EHR use was significantly less common among SUD facilities compared to MH facilities for both nonexclusive (mixed computer and paper) and exclusive (paper-free) use. Fewer than 25 % of facilities of either type reported exclusive EHR use for core clinical activities (progress notes, laboratory monitoring, and prescriptions) with wide variability among states. Being an inpatient facility, having Joint Commission accreditation, being a private-for-profit, or a public facility were significantly positively associated with exclusive EHR use for core clinical activities; these associations were stronger among SUD facilities than MH facilities. Accepting Medicare was associated with exclusive EHR use for core clinical activities in both facility types, while accepting private insurance was associated with such use only among SUD treatment facilities. Conclusions: EHR adoption among SUD facilities lags behind MH facilities. However, exclusive EHR use for clinical purposes remains elusive for both types of facilities with no more than a quarter of facilities in any state reporting such use. Some of the factors associated with exclusive EHR use for clinical purposes among SUD treatment facilities-such as Joint Commission accreditation-may be policy leverage points to expedite EHR adoption in these facilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available