4.3 Article

Comparison of PCV-10 and PCV-13 vaccine coverage for invasive pneumococcal isolates obtained across Canadian geographic regions, SAVE 2011 to 2017

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115282

Keywords

Streptococcus pneumoniae; Serotype; PCV-10; PCV-13; Canada

Funding

  1. Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance (CARA)
  2. National Microbiology Laboratory (NML)
  3. Merck Canada
  4. Pfizer Canada
  5. Shared Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the coverage of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae by pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV)-10 and PCV-13 in Canada. The results showed that PCV-13 provided significantly greater coverage of S. pneumoniae serotypes and MDR isolates compared to PCV-10.
To assess the coverage of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae by pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV)-10 and PCV-13 across Canada. In total, 9166 invasive S. pneumoniae isolates were collected as part of the SAVE 2011 to 2017 study. Serotyping was performed by the Quellung reaction and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI methods. The proportion of both PCV-10 and PCV-13 serotypes decreased significantly (P < 0.0001) from 2011 (26.7% and 48.0%, respectively) to 2017 (11.2% and 26.2%). For central, western, and eastern regions of Canada, PCV-13 provided significantly greater (P 0.0001) coverage at 33.7% (2060/6110), 23.0% (456/1985), and 36.3% (389/1071), respectively, compared to PCV-10 at 15.4% (939/ 6110), 10.1% (201/1985), and 15.8% (169/1071) coverage. PCV-13 provided significantly greater coverage (53.3%, 282/529) of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates (resistant to 3 antimicrobial classes) than PCV-10 (14.6%, 77/529, P < 0.0001). PCV-13 provided significantly greater coverage of invasive S. pneumoniae serotypes, as well as coverage of MDR isolates, than PCV-10. Crown Copyright (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available