4.7 Article

The efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in women and men with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Journal

DIABETOLOGIA
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 1226-1234

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-021-05399-2

Keywords

Cardiovascular outcomes; Clinical trials; SGLT2 inhibitors; Women

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, it was found that gender did not significantly impact the development of cardiovascular or renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with dapagliflozin. Furthermore, dapagliflozin showed similar safety and efficacy profiles in women and men.
Aims/hypothesis Women remain underrepresented in clinical trials and those with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at high risk for cardiovascular (CV) events. The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin reduces the risk of CV death or heart failure hospitalisations in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Here, we performed a pre-specified analysis to examine whether sex modifies these effects. Methods The DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial randomised 17,160 patients with type 2 diabetes with or at risk for atherosclerotic disease to dapagliflozin or placebo (median follow-up 4.2 years). The dual efficacy outcomes were CV death or heart failure hospitalisations, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; CV death, myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke). The renal-specific composite outcome was a sustained >= 40% drop in eGFR to <60 ml min(-1) [1.73 m](-2), new end-stage renal disease or renal death. Cox models were run separately by sex with treatment-by-sex interaction testing for each outcome. Results At baseline, women (n = 6422, 37.4%) had higher HbA(1c), longer type 2 diabetes duration, and were on fewer glucose-lowering medications. There was no evidence of modification of the effect of dapagliflozin by sex for (1) CV death or heart failure hospitalisations: women (3.8% vs 4.5%; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66, 1.07) and men (5.3% vs 6.4%; HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71, 0.96; p(interaction) = 0.90); (2) MACE: women (6.3% vs 6.8%; HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77, 1.12) and men (10.0% vs 10.7%; HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83, 1.05; p(interaction) = 0.99); or (3) renal-specific composite: women (1.4% vs 2.8%; HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.35, 0.70) and men (1.5% vs 2.5%; HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42, 0.73; p(interaction) = 0.64). The overall safety profile of dapagliflozin was similar for women and men. Conclusions/interpretation Dapagliflozin offers comparable CV and renal benefits and a comparable safety profile in women and men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available