4.4 Article

Correlates of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use Trajectories in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

Journal

DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 590-594

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0668

Keywords

Continuous glucose monitoring; Adherence; Pediatrics; Type 1 diabetes

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R21 HD090555] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified three patterns of CGM use trajectories in youth, including sustained high, declining, and sustained low. Youth in the sustained low and declining groups were more likely to use a receiver instead of a smart phone. Factors such as age, race, ethnicity, income, and insulin regimen did not differentiate between the trajectory groups. Future research should focus on longer follow-up periods and identifying baseline factors that predict low or declining CGM use in youth over time.
The goal of this study was to characterize trajectories of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use in youth 5-12 weeks after starting CGM and examine what factors differentiate between the trajectory groups. Parent-youth dyads completed assessments before starting CGM. Days of CGM use between weeks 5 and 12 were accessed through cloud-based data repository. Three patterns of use were observed among 96 youth (mean age 13.4 +/- 2.75 years; 75% white): sustained high, declining, and sustained low. Youth in the sustained low and declining groups were more likely than those in the sustained high group to use a receiver (versus smart phone). There were no differences between the trajectory groups with respect to age, race, ethnicity, income, or insulin regimen. Future research should examine trajectory groups for a longer follow-up period and identify baseline factors that reliably predict which youth will have low or declining CGM use over time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available