4.5 Review

Predictive value of abnormal ankle-brachial index in patients with diabetes: A meta-analysis

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108723

Keywords

Ankle-brachial index; Diabetes; Mortality; Major adverse cardiovascular events; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation [20180550208]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis found that abnormal ankle brachial index (ABI) is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular or all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with diabetes. The predictive role of abnormal ABI is largely dominated by the low ABI rather than the high ABI.
Aims: This meta-analysis aimed to examine the association of abnormal ankle brachial index (ABI) with adverse prognosis in patients with diabetes. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase databases from inception to October 31, 2020 for observational studies investigating the predictive utility of abnormal ABI in patients with diabetes. The normal ABI is usually defined by 0.9-1.3 or 1.4. Results: Data were collected from 9 studies involving 9673 patients. When compared with the reference normal ABI, abnormal ABI was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.98; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.66-2.37), all-cause mortality (RR 2.12; 95% CI 1.81-2.49), and major adverse cardiovascular events ([MACEs] RR 2.37; 95% CI 1.73-3.26). Subgroup analysis indicated that the pooled RR of cardiovascular mortality was similar in individuals with abnormally low ABI (RR 1.98; 95% CI 1.64-2.39) or high ABI (RR 2.00; 95% CI 1.12-3.59). Conclusions: Abnormal ABI independently predicts subsequent risk of cardiovascular or all cause mortality and MACEs in patients with diabetes. However, the predictive role of abnormal ABI is largely dominated by the low ABI rather than the high ABI. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available