4.4 Article

Molecular detection of maturation stages in the developing kidney

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 470, Issue -, Pages 62-73

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2020.11.002

Keywords

Kidney development; Single-cell RNA sequencing; Maturation; In situ hybridization

Funding

  1. KAKENHI grant from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JP17H06177]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By conducting single-cell RNA sequencing on developing kidneys in mice, researchers identified gene expression profiles at different developmental stages, revealing that most cell types in transplanted embryonic kidneys mature similarly to neonatal kidneys in vivo, indicating non-synchronous maturation across cell lineages.
Recent advances in stem cell biology have enabled the generation of kidney organoids in vitro, and further maturation of these organoids is observed after experimental transplantation. However, the current organoids remain immature and their precise maturation stages are difficult to determine because of limited information on developmental stage-dependent gene expressions in the kidney in vivo. To establish relevant molecular coordinates, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on developing kidneys at different stages in the mouse. By selecting genes that exhibited upregulation at birth compared with embryonic day 15.5 as well as cell lineage-specific expression, we generated gene lists correlated with developmental stages in individual cell lineages. Application of these lists to transplanted embryonic kidneys revealed that most cell types, other than the collecting ducts, exhibited similar maturation to kidneys at the neonatal stage in vivo, revealing non-synchronous maturation across the cell lineages. Thus, our scRNA-seq data can serve as useful molecular coordinates to assess the maturation of developing kidneys and eventually of kidney organoids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available