4.6 Review

Recent progress in the research of exosomes and Dscam regulated crab antiviral immunity

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2020.103925

Keywords

Crab; Antivirus; Immunity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972820, 31970490]
  2. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [20QA1403000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crustaceans, such as crabs and shrimp, lack adaptive immunity and rely solely on innate immunity for pathogen defense. The white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) is highly pathogenic to penaeid shrimps and is a widely prevalent viral disease. Crabs serve as interesting models for studying immune responses to WSSV infection, with recent reviews focusing on antiviral functions such as exosome-mediated apoptosis and alternatively spliced Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule.
Crustaceans, including crab and shrimp, generally lack lymphocytes or adaptive immunity, and they rely solely on innate immunity for pathogen defense. The white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) causes the most prevalent viral disease in penaeid shrimps, which are widely cultured species in coastal waters worldwide. Numerous studies have elucidated the role of the immune system in protecting shrimps from WSSV infection for the development of safe and effective defensive strategies against WSSV. Although WSSV has a wide host range, it appears to exhibit high pathogenicity and virulence in only penaeid shrimps. Crabs are interesting models for studying immune responses after WSSV infection. Therefore, we reviewed recent information on the innate immune responses of crabs to WSSV and mainly focused on the antiviral functions of exosome-mediated apoptosis and alternatively spliced Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule. Our review may provide novel insights into antiviral management for crustaceans, especially penaeid shrimps.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available