4.4 Review

Update on maculopathy secondary to pentosan polysulfate toxicity

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 233-239

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000754

Keywords

delayed dark adaptation; maculopathy; pentosan polysulfate toxicity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review provides a comprehensive summary of toxic maculopathy secondary to pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS), discussing its characteristics, severity in relation to exposure dosage, and screening methods. Studies suggest that patients with prolonged exposure to PPS may be at risk for maculopathy, highlighting the importance of regular examinations for patients exposed to PPS.
Purpose of review The aim of the present review is to provide a comprehensive summary of available knowledge regarding toxic maculopathy secondary to pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS). Recent findings PPS toxicity was described in 2018, and additional studies characterize it as dysfunction of the retinal pigment epithelium centered on the posterior pole, which can progress despite drug cessation. Requisite exposure can be as little as 0.325 kg and 2.25 years but averages closer to 1-2 kg and 10-15 years. Multimodal imaging should include near-infrared reflectance, optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence. Cross-sectional studies demonstrate evidence correlating cumulative dosing and the likelihood/severity of maculopathy. Early estimates of prevalence range from 12.7 to 41.7% depending on dosing, with overall rates around 20%. Reasonable evidence associates maculopathy with extended exposure to PPS, with an average reported incidence of around 20% in patients with long-term exposures. Patients with unexplained retinal pigment epithelium changes and difficulty with dark adaptation should be questioned regarding PPS exposure, and patients with known exposure to PPS should be examined. Further research is needed to refine screening protocols. Currently, providers should consider baseline examination and examination at 5 years and/or 500 g of exposure followed by yearly screening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available