4.4 Review

Novel vitreous substitutes: the next frontier in vitreoretinal surgery

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 288-293

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000745

Keywords

hydrogel; retinal detachment; tamponade; vitreous substitute

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) [FKZ: 16KN046460]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the complications associated with current clinically used endotamponades and the advantages of novel polymeric hydrogels as vitreous substitutes. Polymeric hydrogels have favorable properties and have shown promising results in preclinical tests, indicating the potential for clinical application in the near future.
Purpose of review After removing the native vitreous during vitreoretinal surgery, an adequate substitute is required to ensure homeostasis of the eye. Current clinically used endotamponades (silicone oil, gases, semifluorinated alkanes) are effective in promoting retinal reattachment, but lead to complications such as emulsification, prolonged inflammation, blurred vision, raised intraocular pressure, cataract formation or the need for revision surgery. The aim of this review is to provide an update on novel vitreous substitutes with a focus on polymer-based systems. Recent findings Polymeric hydrogels provide favourable properties such as high water content, optical transparency, suitable refractive indices and densities, adjustable rheological properties, injectability, biocompatibility and their ability to tamponade the retina via viscosity and swelling pressure, comparable to the native human vitreous body. Here, vitreous replacement strategies can be divided into chemically or physically crosslinked hydrogel systems that are applied as preformed or in-situ gelling matrices. Several hydrogel-based vitreous substitutes have already been positively evaluated in preclinical tests and have the potential to enter the clinical phase soon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available