4.4 Review

Current treatment strategies for symptomatic vitreous opacities

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 198-202

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000752

Keywords

floaters; symptomatic vitreous opacities; vitrectomy; vitreolysis; YAG laser

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Symptomatic vitreous opacities are a significant burden to patient well-being, with vitrectomy or laser treatment being increasingly used to address the issue. While studies show significant improvement postvitrectomy, concerns remain about the risks associated with surgery.
Purpose of review Symptomatic vitreous opacities are increasingly recognized as a significant burden to patient well-being. There is growing interest in the use of vitrectomy or laser treatment to address these problems. This review is intended to update current assessment, management, and risks of treatment for persistent severely symptomatic vitreous opacities. Recent findings Despite studies showing the value of quantitative ultrasound, reading speed measurements, and contrast sensitivity for assessing dysfunction caused by vitreous opacities, the decision of whether to proceed with surgery remains a very subjective, clinical one. Visual Function Questionnaire-25 score studies show a very large improvement postvitrectomy consistent with relief from symptoms and patient satisfaction. The risk of retinal tear and detachment appears to be higher than in most conditions treated with vitrectomy. Vitrectomy for the management of severe vitreous opacities is increasingly accepted because of the tremendous relief of symptoms reported by patients. The risks of retinal tear and detachment remain a concern, particularly in patients who have an attached posterior hyaloid. Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser treatment of floaters may offer benefit in a subset of patients but appears to be less definitive than vitrectomy, and also may carry significant risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available