4.3 Review

Pharmacogenomics of statins and familial hypercholesterolemia

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 96-102

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000746

Keywords

familial hypercholesterolemia; pharmacogenomics; statins

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent research has revealed associations between statin pharmacogenomics, but the applicability of this knowledge remains uncertain in high-risk populations. New research methods and insights are helping to better understand the effects of statin therapy and the issue of patients reaching therapeutic target values.
Purpose of review To collect evidence on statin pharmacogenomics, and review what is known in this field for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients. Recent findings There are well-known associations between specific single nucleotide polymorphisms involved in statin transport and metabolism and either adverse effects or altered lipid-lowering efficacy. However, the applicability of this knowledge is uncertain, especially in high-risk populations. There are alternative approaches to study plasma concentrations of statins and new insights on why some association studies fail to be replicated. Statin therapy recommendations are not always followed in primary and secondary prevention and, even when followed, patients often fail to reach therapeutic target values. Considering the stringent 2019 European Atherosclerosis Society and European Society of Cardiology recommended target lipid levels, as well as the persistently high cost for alternative lipid-lowering therapies such as PCSK9 inhibitors, the variability in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reductions on statin therapy is still an important factor that needs to be addressed to ensure better cardiovascular disease risk management, especially for FH patients, who have not been well studied historically in this context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available