4.7 Review

Accelerating strain engineering in biofuel research via build and test automation of synthetic biology

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages 88-98

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.01.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFA09006700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31971513]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biofuels are sustainable and renewable energy sources, but their economical production in bulk volume presents challenges in biosystems design. High-throughput screening and automation are crucial, with biofoundries emerging as a new infrastructure to accelerate biological design processes. Despite the advancements, future challenges and opportunities lie in creating a flexible and data-driven framework for biofuel research and development.
Biofuels are a type of sustainable and renewable energy. However, for the economical production of bulk-volume biofuels, biosystems design is particularly challenging to achieve sufficient yield, titer, and productivity. Because of the lack of predictive modeling, high-throughput screening remains essential. Recently established biofoundries provide an emerging infrastructure to accelerate biological design-build-test-learn (DBTL) cycles through the integration of robotics, synthetic biology, and informatics. In this review, we first introduce the technical advances of build and test automation in synthetic biology, focusing on the use of industry-standard microplates for DNA assembly, chassis engineering, and enzyme and strain screening. Proof-of-concept studies on prototypes of automated foundries are then discussed, for improving biomass deconstruction, metabolic conversion, and host robustness. We conclude with future challenges and opportunities in creating a flexible, versatile, and data-driven framework to support biofuel research and development in biofoundries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available