4.6 Review

Sceletium for Managing Anxiety, Depression and Cognitive Impairment: A Traditional Herbal Medicine in Modern-Day Regulatory Systems

Journal

CURRENT NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages 1384-1400

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1570159X19666210215124737

Keywords

Mesembryanthemum tortuosum; sceletium; anxiety; depression; regulations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modern regulatory systems create barriers for traditional herbal medicines to enter international markets, aiming to ensure consumer safety and product quality. This unintentional regulatory favoritism may hinder innovation and create economic hurdles for botanicals from developing countries to enter global health product markets.
Modern-day regulatory systems governing conditions for how health products enter national markets constitute a barrier of access for traditional herbal medicines on an international level. Regulatory intentions are focused on ensuring that consumers are being provided with safe, efficacious and high-quality products that, however, collaterally limit opportunities for traditional herbal medicinal products, especially those that do not already have a long-standing tradition of use established in the respective national marketplaces. This case study investigates and compares how a Southern African herbal medicine with great potential as an anxiolytic and mild antidepressant Mesembryanthemum tortuosum L. [syn. Sceletium tortuosum (L.) N.E.Br.] aerial parts - fares internationally in today's regulatory environments. It is argued that inadvertent regulatory favoritism combined with the lack of means for adequate protection of intellectual property may obstruct innovation by creating an almost insurmountable economical hurdle for successful product development and introduction of botanicals from developing countries into most of the world's health product markets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available