4.7 Review

Microbial physiological engineering increases the efficiency of microbial cell factories

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 339-354

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2020.1856770

Keywords

Physiological functions; microbial cell factories; substrate utilization; growth performance; stress tolerance; products transportation

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0901400]
  2. Scientific and Technological Innovation Leading Talents of National Ten Thousand Talent Program (2018)
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP22031]
  4. National First-Class Discipline Program of Light Industry Technology and Engineering [LITE2018-08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review proposes a strategy of microbial physiological engineering (MPE) to improve the efficiency of microbial cell factories, focusing on enhancing substrate utilization, growth performance, stress tolerance, and product export capacity.
Microbial cell factories provide vital platforms for the production of chemicals. Advanced biotechnological toolboxes have been developed to enhance their efficiency. However, these tools have limitations in improving physiological functions, and therefore boosting the efficiency (e.g. titer, rate, and yield) of microbial cell factories remains a challenge. In this review, we propose a strategy of microbial physiological engineering (MPE) to improve the efficiency of microbial cell factories. This strategy integrates tools from synthetic and systems biology to characterize and regulate physiological functions during chemical synthesis. MPE strategies mainly focus on the efficiency of substrate utilization, growth performance, stress tolerance, and the product export capacity of cell factories. In short, this review provides a new framework for resolving the bottlenecks that currently exist in low-efficiency cell factories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available