4.5 Article

Experimental recalibration of the Cr-in-clinopyroxene geobarometer: improved precision and reliability above 4.5 GPa

Journal

CONTRIBUTIONS TO MINERALOGY AND PETROLOGY
Volume 176, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00410-020-01768-z

Keywords

Geothermobarometry; Lherzolite; Mantle; Diopside; Chromium; Diamonds; Lithospheric mantle; Single crystal geothermobarometry; Cratonic lithosphere; Kimberlites; Xenolith; Peridotite; Experimental petrology; Multi anvil; Piston cylinder

Funding

  1. Australian National University
  2. Australian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors recalibrated the exchange of chromium between clinopyroxene and garnet in peridotite as a geobarometer, presenting a new calibration equation. The pressure estimates calculated using the new geobarometer are in good agreement with other geobarometer methods in the range of 2-7 GPa.
The pressure dependence of the exchange of Cr between clinopyroxene and garnet in peridotite is applicable as a geobarometer for mantle-derived Cr-diopside xenocrysts and xenoliths. The most widely used calibration (Nimis and Taylor Contrib Miner Petrol 139: 541-554, 2000; herein NT00) performs well at pressures below 4.5 GPa, but has been shown to consistently underestimate pressures above 4.5 GPa. We have experimentally re-examined this exchange reaction over an extended pressure, temperature, and compositional range using multi-anvil, belt, and piston cylinder apparatuses. Twentynine experiments were completed between 3-7 GPa, and 1100-1400 degrees C in a variety of compositionally complex lherzolitic systems. These experiments are used in conjunction with several published experimental datasets to present a modified calibration of the widely-used NT00 Cr-in-clinopyroxene (Cr-in-cpx) single crystal geobarometer. Our updated calibration calculates P ( GPa) as a function of T (K), CaCr Tschermak activity in clinopyroxene (a(CaCrTs)(cpx)), and Cr/(Cr + Al) (Cr#) in clinopyroxene. Rearranging experimental results into a 2n polynomial using multiple linear regression found the following expression for pressure: P(GPa) = 11.03 + (-T(K) ln(a(CaCrTs)(cpx)) x 0.001088) + (1.526 x ln(Cr#cpx/T(K))) where Cr#(cpx) = (Cr/Cr+Al), a(CaCrTs)(cpx) = Cr - 0.81 center dot Cr#(cpx) center dot (Na + K), with all mineral components calculated assuming six oxygen anions per formula unit in clinopyroxene. Temperature (K) may be calculated through a variety of geothermometers, however, we recommend the NT00 single crystal, enstatite-in-clinopyroxene (en-in-cpx) geothermometer. The pressure uncertainty of our updated calibration has been propagated by incorporating all analytical and experimental uncertainties. We have found that pressure estimates below 4 GPa, between 4-6 GPa and above 6 GPa have associated uncertainties of 0.31, 0.35, and 0.41 GPa, respectively. Pressures calculated using our calibration of the Cr-in-cpx geobarometer are in good agreement between 2-7 GPa, and 900-1400 degrees C with those estimated from widely-used two-phase geobarometers based on the solubility of alumina in orthopyroxene coexisting with garnet. Application of our updated calibration to suites of well-equilibrated garnet lherzolite and garnet pyroxenite xenoliths and xenocrysts from the Diavik-Ekati kimberlite and the Argyle lamproite pipes confirm the accuracy and precision of our modified geobarometer, and show that PT estimates using our revised geobarometer result in systematically steeper paleogeotherms and higher estimates of the lithosphere.asthenosphere boundary compared with the original NT00 calibration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available