4.7 Article

Evaluation of technological properties of fired clay bricks containing pyrrhotite ash

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 269, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121312

Keywords

Pyrrhotite ash; Iron oxide; Recycling; Clay bricks; Secondary raw material; Technological properties

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades of Spain [RTI2018-099668-B-C22]
  2. FEDER funds
  3. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [RyC-2015-17870]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the recycling of pyrrhotite ash (PA) waste as a secondary raw material for clay brick bodies, including characterizing the waste and preparing clay bricks with different PA contents for testing. The results suggest that adding up to 30 wt% of PA waste can enhance the possibility of reuse in a safe and sustainable manner.
This work investigates the recycling of pyrrhotite ash (PA) waste as a method to provide a secondary raw material for clay brick bodies. PA is an industrial waste mainly composed by iron oxide particles (64,9 wt%). It was produced during the production of sulfuric acid from the combustion of pyrrhotite ore. This waste was characterized by X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and differential thermal analysis. The morphology and distribution of particles size were also studied. Clay bricks containing yellow clay and different content of PA (10-50 wt%) were prepared, fired at 1000 degrees C and tested to evaluate their technological properties (e.g. linear shrinkage, water absorption, bulk density, apparent porosity and flexural strength). The microstructure of the sintered bricks was also evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The test results indicate that the addition up to 30 wt% of PA waste to clay bricks could be used, which would enhance the possibility of its reuse in a safe and sustainable way. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available